VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

A.Thilagawathi v. The District Revenue Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
4 December 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 28567/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The petitioner undertakes to submit an online application for issuance of patta. On receipt thereof, the fourth respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. All the interested parties shall be put on notice before passing the order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the fourth respondent to pass order one way or the other.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

04.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Revenue Officer, District Collectorate, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Tahsildar, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

04.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN A.Thilagawathi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, District Collectorate, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Commissioner, Paramakudi Municipality, Ramanathapuram District. 4.The Tahsildar, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents No. 1 to 4 to issue patta by carrying out necessary mutations in the revenue records in favour of the petitioner for the lands in T.S.No. 257, 258, Ward H, Block 4, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District in an extent of 242 Sqft . For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajasekar for M/s.Lajapathi Roy & Associates For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate for R1, R2 & R4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.