Kasiammal v. The District Collector

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The second respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is second to the third respondent to pass order one way or the other. Interested persons shall be put on notice before passing the order.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

04.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Collector, Collector Office,

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Sathur,

3.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Sivakasi Taluk, Sivakasi,

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

04.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Kasiammal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Collector Office, 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Sathur, 3.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Sivakasi Taluk, Sivakasi, 4.Nagar 5.Rajkumar ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 02.07.2023 based on 3rd respondent recommendation in Na.Ka.No. A1/7851/2022 dated 01.11.2022 within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ponraj For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3