- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 7 December 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 22059/2023
Judgment
ORDER This Criminal Original Petition is filed to direct the 2nd Respondent not to harass the Petitioner under the guise of without any valid complaint against him and based on his representation dated
30.11.2023.
¶2Learned Government Advocate submitted that on the file of the third respondent, a case in Crime No.116 of 2023 was registered against this petitioner. Another complaint has been given against this petitioner before the second respondent herein. On that account, the second respondent has issued summons for investigation. Without responding to the summons, the petitioner has come up with this petition.
¶3When the petitioner is subsequently involved in another crime, she must appear before the second respondent and co-operate with the investigation process. If any trouble arises during the course of enquiry, he is at liberty to work out remedy through appropriate proceedings. There is no question of harassment at the hands of the respondents herein.
¶4With the above said liberty, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.
07.12.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : pnn To
1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelvel.
2.The Inspector of Police, Uvari Police Station, Tirunelveli District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Thattarmadam Police Station, Thoothukudi District.
4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN
,J.
pnn
07.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:07.12.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN S.Sakthivel ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelvel. 2.The Inspector of Police, Uvari Police Station, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Thattarmadam Police Station, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to grant Direction, directing the 2nd Respondent not to harass the Petitioner under the guise of without any valid complaint against him and based on his representation dated 30.11.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.S.P.Naveenkumar For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.