S.Arulraj v. The Superintendent of Police

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition had been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to instruct the third respondent not to interfere with the civil dispute and not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl) would submit that based on the complaint given by the fourth respondent enquiry has been undertaken. It is seen that there is a money dispute between the parties. The parties were advised to work out their remedy before the appropriate forum and the said complaint was closed.

3.In view of the above, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as infructuous.

06.12.2023 NCC:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No PNM To

¶1The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District.

¶2The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Puliyangudi, Tenkasi District.

¶3The Inspector of Police, Kadayanallur Police Station Tenkasi District.

¶4The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

G.ILANGOVAN, J. PNM ORDER IN

06.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN S.Arulraj ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Puliyangudi, Tenkasi District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Kadayanallur Police Station Tenkasi District. 4. Ismayil ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying this Court to direct the R1 and R2 to instruct the R3 not to interfere with the civil dispute and not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Dinesh For Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar (R1-R3) Government Advocate (Crl)