VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

K.Devi v. The Commissioner

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 December 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 28855/2023

Judgment

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition and also circulated a letter to the Registry.

2.Permission is granted. This Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

18.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To

1.The Commissioner, O/o. The Commissioner of Corporation, Dindigul District.

2.The Divisional Engineer, O/o.The Divisional Engineer, Highways Department, Construction & Maintenance (M), Pandiyan Nagar, Dindigul District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and W.M.P(MD)No.24899 of 2023

18.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)No.24899 of 2023 K.Devi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, O/o. The Commissioner of Corporation, Dindigul District. 2.The Divisional Engineer, O/o.The Divisional Engineer, Highways Department, Construction & Maintenance (M), Pandiyan Nagar, Dindigul District. 3.The General Manager, Dindigul District Co-operative Milk Producer Union, Dindigul District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order in Na.Ka.No. 3531/Virpanai/2017 dated 27.11.2023 passed by the third respondent and quash the same as illegal and unsustainable under law and consequently direct the third respondent to issue order extending the period of license in favour of the petitioner for further period of two years to her Aavin Palagam at Manakattur Salai, Sub-Collector Office Road, Front Side of Commercial Tax Department, Dindigul District. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rajaselvan For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate for R.1 & R.2 Mr.K.Prabhu for R.3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.