S.Pandiyakonar v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

ORDER

Heard both sides.

¶2The second respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The second respondent will put on notice all the interested parties before passing final order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the second respondent to pass order one way or the other.

¶3This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

11.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tenkasi, Tenkasi District.

2.The Tahsildar, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

11.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.Pandiyakonar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tenkasi, Tenkasi District. 2.The Tahsildar, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider and pass order on the petitioner's representation dated 18.02.2023 to restore the patta No. 982, an extent of 0.53.50 hectare in Survey No. 1001/6, Madathupatti Village, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District in his name in the light of the second respondent proceedings in D.Ri.R.1241/95-96 dated 12.09.1995 and thereby issue fresh patta to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sankar For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddharthan Additional Government Pleader