Adaikan v. The District Collector

ORDER Heard both sides.

¶2The petitioner seeks issuance of separate digitalize patta in his favour in respect of the petition mentioned land.

¶3The report given by VAO indicates the name of the petitioner's father. The petitioner's father is no more. It is seen that the said survey No.108/7 was sub divided and Survey No.108/7b was allotted to the petitioner. There appears to be no rival claim also. Be that as it may, the second respondent is directed to hold enquiry and pass an appropriate order on the petitioner's request. This shall be done within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶4The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

06.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Collector, District Collector Office,

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai,

3.The Village Administrative Officer, Koothalur Group, Karaikudi Taluk,

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

06.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Adaikan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, District Collector Office, 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, 3.The Village Administrative Officer, Koothalur Group, Karaikudi Taluk, ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to issue separate digitalize patta to the petitioner based on the patta mutation order dated 25.06.2003 in respect of land in S.No.108/7 in Koothalur Village, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivagangai District within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Jeyaram Sidharth For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddharthan Special Government Pleader for R1 to R4