K.Kannan v. The Tahsildar

ORDER

Heard both sides.

2.The learned Additional Government Pleader informs the Court that survey was already done and that the boundaries stones were also installed. The neighbour had illegally removed the same. That cannot be a ground for conducting one more survey. The survey report as well as the survey sketch have already been served on the petitioner. It is for the petitioner to protect his rights based on the same.

3.With this observation, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

06.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To

1.The Tahsildar, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District.

2.The Taluk Head Surveyor, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District.

3.The Village Administrative Officer, Sedapatti, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

06.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN K.Kannan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District. 2.The Taluk Head Surveyor, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District. 3.The Village Administrative Officer, Sedapatti, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner application in Challan No. 20230324014165 dated 24.03.2023 for surveying the property in Survey No. 232/8 measuring an extent of 1646.8 sq. ft covered in patta No. 381, situated at Sedapatti Village, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Prabhakaran For Respondents : Mr.S.RA.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader