Muthumeenal v. The Commissioner of Land (Administration)

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the official respondent.

¶2All that the petitioner wants is disposal of the petition mentioned Revision Petition. No exception can be taken to the said request. The first respondent is directed to dispose of the petition mentioned Revision Petition on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The interested parties including the private respondent herein will have to be necessarily heard before the final order is passed. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is for the first respondent to pass order one way or the other.

¶3The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

11.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To The Commissioner of Land (Administration), Land Administration Department, 2nd Floor, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

11.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Muthumeenal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Land (Administration), Land Administration Department, 2nd Floor, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai. 2.AR.Sivagami Achi ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to dispose the Revision Petition filed by the Petitioner in No.K3/37960/2007 filed on 26.11.2007 and subsequent reminder dated 17.10.2023 within time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.RM.Arun Swaminathan For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate for R.1