Jesuraj v. The District Revenue Officer

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioners and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the official respondents.

2.All that the petitioners want is disposal of the petition mentioned revision. No exception can be taken to the said request. The first respondent is directed to dispose of the petition mentioned revision on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The interested parties including the private respondents herein will have to be necessarily heard before the final order is passed. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is for the first respondent to pass order one way or the other.

3.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

13.12.2023 NCC :No Internet :Yes Index :No MGA To

1.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

3.The Tahsildar, Athur Taluk, Dindigul District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA W.P.(MD)No.29387 of 2023

13.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :13.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.29387 of 2023 1.Jesuraj 2.Arulmani 3.J.Arulvimala Mary 4.Salomon Arockiadhas ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 3.The Tahsildar, Athur Taluk, Dindigul District. 4.Gobinath 5.Karthick 6.Jeyabalakrishnan ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to dispose the revision pending on his file in Na.Ka.No.22895/2021/A4 within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Baskarapandiyan For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate for R.1 to R.3