Aranavalli v. The District Collector

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The third respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the third respondent to pass order one way or the other. Interested persons shall be put on notice before passing the order.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

12.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Melur, Madurai District.

4.The Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Madurai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

12.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.25304 of 2023 Aranavalli ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Melur, Madurai District. 4.The Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. 5.R.Selvi 6.Muniyammal ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 3rd Respondent herein to cancel the Patta No.775 and 776 issued in favour of the Respondents No.5 and 6 in connection with property comprised in S.No.269/1 and S.No. 269/3 to an extent of 1 Acre 76 cents situated at 67, Keeranur Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai District, by issuing the Patta to the Petitioner, on the basis of the Petitioner's representation dated 03.10.2022 within time frame stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Palanisamy For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader for R1 to R4