- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 December 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 29254/2023
Judgment
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel on either side.
¶2The first respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is for the first respondent to pass order one way or other. The first respondent shall put the interested persons including the private respondent herein on notice before passing the final order.
¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.
13.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To The Tahsildar, Sivagangai Taluk Office, Sivagangai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA
13.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Chellapandi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Sivagangai Taluk Office, Sivagangai District. 2.Nachammal ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 24.11.2023 and to change the mistake in the Computer Chitta in Patta No. 370. For Petitioner : Mr.A.V.Arun For Respondents : Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader for R.1
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.