VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Petchiammal v. The Superintendent of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 December 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 22734/2023

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition is filed to direct the second respondent police not to harass the petitioner and her family under the guise of enquiry and consequently take action against the third respondent not harassed the petitioner in the guise of enquiry.

¶2Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that on the basis of the complaint given by the third respondent, enquiry is undertaken. During the course of enquiry, both sides appeared and gave an undertaking that she will return the jewels on or before 11.08.2023. But till date, the undertaking was not complied by the petitioner. Without complying the undertaking given by her during the enquiry, the petitioner has come up with this petition.

¶3In view of the above submission, it is seen that this petition has been filed by the petitioner by suppressing the true facts. I find no reason to entertain this petition.

¶4Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

18.12.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : pnn To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar West Division Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN

,J.

pnn

18.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:18.12.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Petchiammal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar West Division Police Station, Virudhunagar District. 3.Subbulakshmi ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the second respondent police not to harass the petitioner and her family under the guise of enquiry and consequently take action against the third respondent not harassed the petitioner in the guise of enquiry. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Pandian For R1 & R2 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Addl.Public Prosecutor (Crl.side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.