Kannan.K.V v. The District Collector

ORDER When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate submitted that the petition mentioned property is in the name of the temple and that therefore, patta cannot be issued in favour of the petitioner. If that be so, the fourth respondent is directed to formally communicate his decision to the petitioner, so that the petitioner can take recourse to the appropriate legal remedies.

¶2With this liberty to the fourth respondent, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

12.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector,

2.The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue Office,

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kulithalai,

4.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Kadavur, Tharakampatti Post,

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

12.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN K.V.Kannan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, 2.The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue Office, 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kulithalai, 4.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Kadavur, Tharakampatti Post, ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the Respondents to include the petitioner's name in the Computer Chitta in respect of Survey Nos. 214 and 215, acres 22.01 at Tharangampadi, Idayapatti Village, Kadavur, Kulithalai Circle, Karur District by considering the petitioners representation dated on 24.07.2023 within stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rajaselvan For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate