Lokidasan.A v. The District Revenue Officer

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents.

2.The prayer in the writ petition cannot be countenanced. If any adverse order is passed by the authority concerned, the petitioner can always come before this Court for challenging the same. The question of interfering at this stage does not arise.

3.Leaving open all the contentions of the writ petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

12.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To

1.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Madurai District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti, Madurai District.

3.The Tahsildar, Peraiyur Taluk, Peraiyur, Madurai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and W.M.P(MD)No.25310 of 2023

12.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)No.25310 of 2023 A.Lokidasan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Madurai District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti, Madurai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Peraiyur Taluk, Peraiyur, Madurai District. 4.M.Perumal 5.S.Saila 6.A.Lakshmi Narayanan ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent not transfer the Patta Nos. 3003, 3201, 3202 in S.Nos. 332/8B4A and 332/8B4B, 269/1, 269/4A, 269/4E situated at Thirumanickam Village, Madurai District till the disposal of the proceedings pending before the first respondent in Na.Ka.No. 34945/2021/G5. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddharthan Additional Government Pleader for R.1 to R.3