- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 15 December 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 29335/2023
Judgment
ORDER When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel himself submitted that the authorities have removed the blockage in the petition mentioned water body. The authorities are directed to ensure that the water body remains free of any blockage or encroachment for all times to come in future.
¶2The Writ petition is disposed of, accordingly. No costs.
15.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No RM To:
1.The District Collector Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer - Cum - Sub Collector, Paramakudi,
3.The Superintendent of Police
4.The Thasildhar Paramakudi,
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. RM
15.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN M.Shanmugavel ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer - Cum - Sub Collector, Paramakudi, 3.The Superintendent of Police 4.The Thasildhar Paramakudi, 5.Balasburamani, The President, Madanthai Village, Paramakudi Taluk, 6.Muniyandi ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.12.2023 within a stipulated time period in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Senthil Murugan For Respondents: Mr.M.Prakash – for R1, R2 & R4 Additional Government Pleader Mr.A.Alber James – for R3 Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.