VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Abdul Samad v. The Superintendent of Police

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
15 December 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 22612/2023

Judgment

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition is filed to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner without following due process of law under the garb of conducting an inquiry into a complaint lodged by the third respondent.

¶2The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the third respondent, enquiry was undertaken in C.No.26 of 2023. During the course of enquiry, both sides appeared and this petitioner gave an undertaking that they will resolve the issue at the Jamath level. Based upon the above said statement, the above said enquiry was closed on 06.10.2023.

¶3In view of the submissions made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, nothing survives for further consideration or direction in this matter. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

15.12.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Indu To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Inspector of Police, Ervadi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN. J. Indu

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.22612 of 2023

15.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:15.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.22612 of 2023 Abdul Samad ... Petitioner Vs. 1.State Rep by The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Inspector of Police, Ervadi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. 3.Raihan Taj 4.Sayed Risha ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner without following due process of law under the garb of conducting an inquiry into a complaint lodged by the third respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balaji For R1 & R2 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.