Saravanan v. The Revenue Divisional Officer Cum Senior Citizens Tribunal

ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent/Maintenance Tribunal.

¶2The petitioner questions the notice issued by the Maintenance Tribunal. The second respondent who is the mother of the petitioner had executed a settlement deed in favour of the petitioner, to cancel the same given a petition before the Tribunal. The Tribunal has taken cognizance of the same, had issued notice to the petitioner. To prohibit the Tribunal from proceeding with the matter, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the Hon'ble Apex Court has recently held that if no condition as envisaged under Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 is incorporated in the settlement deed, the Maintenance Tribunal will have no jurisdiction to cancel the same.

¶4This contention is well founded. But, then, it is for the Tribunal to see, if the condition is incorporated in the settlement deed or not. Even if the relief of cancellation may be negatived, the Tribunal can still consider granting maintenance relief to the senior citizen/parent. I therefore, do not want to interfere at this stage. I leave open all the rights and defence of the writ petitioner.

¶5The Writ petition is disposed of, accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

15.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No RM To:

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer cum Senior Citizens Tribunal, Iluppur, Pudukottai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. RM

15.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)No.25701 of 2023 Saravanan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer cum Senior Citizens Tribunal, Iluppur, Pudukottai District. 2.Lakshmi ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Prohibition prohibiting the first respondent from proceeding with an enquiry under section 23(1) of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Act 56 of 2007) on the basis of the application of the second respondent seeking to cancel the settlement executed in favour of the petitioner registered as Doc.No.1389/2016 dated 07.06.2016. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff For Respondents: Mr.K.Balasubramani – for R1 Special Government Pleader