Mayil Vahana Rajendran.C v. The Commissioner

ORDER Heard both sides.

2.The petitioner is a practicing lawyer. All that the petitioner wants is that the corporation must carry out the repair works for the petition mentioned locality. While this Court cannot give any positive direction, it can certainly call upon the Corporation to bear in mind the requirements of the petition mentioned locality and act accordingly. The Commissioner, Madurai is called upon to look into the representation of the petitioner dated 29.11.2023 and do the needful.

3.This writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

20.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Skm To

1.The Commissioner, Corporation of Madurai, Madurai.

2.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Zone – 1, Corporation of Madurai, Madurai.

3.The Assistant Engineer, Zone – 1, Corporation of Madurai, Madurai.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. SKM

20.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.12.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN C.Mayil Vahana Rajendran ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Corporation of Madurai, Madurai. 2.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Zone – 1, Corporation of Madurai, Madurai. 3.The Assistant Engineer, Zone – 1, Corporation of Madurai, Madurai. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to carry out of the repair works in 11th South Street and 4th Cross, Meenakshi Amman Nagar, Madurai by considering the petitioner's representation dated 29.11.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Malaiyendran For Respondents : Mr.P.Anbunithi