Periasamy.K.K v. The District Collector

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The third respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is for the third respondent to pass order one way or the other. The third respondent shall put the interested persons on notice before passing the final order.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

15.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No SKM To

1.The District Collector, Pudukkottai District.

2.The District Revenue Officer (DRO), Pudukkottai District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Pudukkottai Division, Pudukkottai District – 622 001.

4.The Thasildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. SKM

15.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN K.K.Periasamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Pudukkottai District. 2.The District Revenue Officer (DRO), Pudukkottai District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Pudukkottai Division, Pudukkottai District – 622 001. 4.The Thasildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to correct the name in the Computerized Patta No.1308 pertaining to Survey No.247/4 situated at Kummangudi Village, Arimalam Panchayat Union, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District, admeasuring to an extent of 0.04.00 Arcs within the Sub-Registration District of Keelanilai, Registration District of Pudukkottai on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 06.10.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.H.Mohamed Ashick For Respondents : Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader