- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 15 December 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 29780/2023
Judgment
O R D E R This Writ Petition is filed in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent Police to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 28.04.2023 in accordance with law.
2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that on the basis of the complaint/representation given by the petitioner, dated
28.04.2023 is pending enquiry.
¶3Considering the submissions made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, let the above said enquiry be completed by summoning the petitioner as well as the counter parties, within a week from the date of appearance of the parties. Depending upon the above said enquiry, further action may be taken either by the official respondents or by the parties, if so aggrieved.
¶4With this direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
15.12.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No INDU To
1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN, J INDU W.P(MD) No.29780 of 2023 Dated 15.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.12.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN W.P(MD) No.29780 of 2023 S.Ponmuthu Pandian ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District. 2. E.Santhosh Kumar, Director of Schatz Enterprises Pvt Ltd., Old No.AD 83, New No.AD 13, 2nd Floor, 5th Avenue, Shanthi Colony, Anna Nagar, Chennai-600 040. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent Police to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 28.04.2023 in accordance with law. For Petitioner :Mr.V.Nagendran For R1 :Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.