- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 December 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 29922/2023
Judgment
O R D E R This Writ Petition is filed in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to act upon the complaint, by considering the petitioner representation dated 14.02.2023 fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
¶2Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, enquiry was conducted. During the course of enquiry, it is found that that the victim girl has voluntarily left the matrimonial home and went to her parental home.
¶3In view of the above submission, this Court is of the view that there is no scope for further adjudication in this case. If the petitioner wants to pursue the matter, he is at liberty to work out his remedy through appropriate proceedings.
¶4With this liberty, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
18.12.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No pnn To
1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul
2.The Inspector of Police, Thadikombu Police Station, Dindigul District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN, J
pnn Dated 18.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.12.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN W.P(MD) No.29922 of 2023 Rajathi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul 2.The Inspector of Police, Thadikombu Police Station, Dindigul District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to act upon the complaint, by considering the petitioner representation dated 14.02.2023 fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Leninkumar For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Addl.Public Prosecutor (Crl.side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.