Raman.K v. The District Revenue Officer

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The first respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is for the first respondent to pass order one way or the other. The first respondent shall put the interested persons on notice before passing the final order.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

15.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No SKM To

1.The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue Officer, Theni. Theni District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. SKM

15.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN K.Raman ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue Officer, Theni. Theni District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to conduct enquiry into the UDR proceedings corrections in respect of Survey No. 98/2 Kullapuram Village, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District standing in the name of petitioner's father late K.Kathiri Mathari, as per representation of the petitioner dated 28.04.2021. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Appadurai For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddharthan Additional Government Pleader