- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 15 December 2023
- Bench
- R.Vijayakumar
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 29866/2023
Judgment
ORDER The present writ petition has been filed by a Selection Grade Conductor of the respondent Transport Corporation, who attained superannuation on 30.09.2019.
¶2According to the writ petitioner, after his retirement, the trade union and the management have entered into a settlement under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Dispute Act on 24.08.2022 conferring the benefits with effect from 01.09.2019. Seeking the said benefits, the petitioner has sent a representation to the respondent authorities on 30.01.2023. Since there is no response, the present writ petition has been filed.
¶3Considering the above said facts, the respondents are directed to consider the said representation, dated 30.01.2023 and to confer the eligible benefits upon the writ petitioner within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
¶4With the above said observations, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.
15.12.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : gbg To
1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (KMB) Ltd., New Railway Station Road, Kumbakonam-612 001.
2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (KMB) Ltd., Karaikudi Region, Managiri Post, Maruthapathi, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. R. VIJAYAKUMAR
,J.
gbg Dated:
15.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.12.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR S.Ramar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (KMB) Ltd., New Railway Station Road, Kumbakonam-612 001. 2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (KMB) Ltd., Karaikudi Region, Managiri Post, Maruthapathi, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to disburse the petitioner's difference amount of salary, Gratuity, Surrender Leave, Provident Fund, Pensions Arrears and to revise Pensions on the basis of 12(3) Settlement, dated 24.08.2022 along with 6 % interest. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Gokul For Respondents : Mr.K.Jagadees Balan Standing Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.