Santhi.K v. The Sub Registrar

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2Admittedly, civil proceedings are pending between the petitioner and the second respondent. The petitioner will have to work out her rights only in the pending proceedings. The petitioner can even file an Interlocutory Application in the pending proceedings and obtain a restraint order against the respondents. Filing the writ petition is not appropriate.

¶3Granting liberty to the petitioner to work out her rights in the pending suit proceedings. This Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.

15.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No RM To:

1.The Sub Registrar O/o. the Sub Registrar, Kallimandayam, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. RM

15.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN K.Shanthi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Sub Registrar O/o. the Sub Registrar, Kallimandayam, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District. 2.Vanchiappa Gounder ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the first respondent from registering the document pertaining to Survey No.388/2B1, 2C1 to an extent of 32 cents, situated in Kallimandayam Village, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District, based on the petitioner's representation, dated 01.12.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Ramasamy For Respondents : Mr.S.Ra.Ramachandran – for R1 Additional Government Pleader