Patric Robinston.F v. The Commissioner of Police

O R D E R This Writ Petition is filed in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to take action on the petitioners compliant dated 09.08.2023.

¶2Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that so far no complaint was received from the petitioner or by any of the parties. Even without enclosing the receipt of payment of money, this petition has been filed.

¶3It is seen that the learned counsel wants to consider his representation dated 09.08.2023 which is pending before the second respondent without any progress. I find no reason to entertain this petition, since no particulars have been submitted by the petitioner to defend his case.

4.Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.

18.12.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No pnn To

1.The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli City.

2.The Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch, Tirunelveli City.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN, J

pnn Dated 18.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.12.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN W.P(MD) No.29887 of 2023 F.Patric Robinston ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli City. 2.The Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch, Tirunelveli City. 3.F.Sudhakar 4.F.Rajasekar ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, by directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to take action on the petitioners compliant dated 09.08.2023 under the criminal law in the light of the dictum laid down by the Honble Court of India in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Anand For R1 & R2 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Addl.Public Prosecutor (Crl.side) `