Venkatachalam v. The District Collector

ORDER Heard both sides.

¶2The request for conducting survey cannot be accepted. This is because, the petitioner is not having patta in his favour. The petitioner has already given an application to the second respondent for issuance of patta.

¶3The second respondent is directed to conduct enquiry and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. Interested parties shall be put on notice before passing the order.

¶4The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

19.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli.

2.The Tahsildar, Thuraiyur, Tiruchirappalli District.

3.The Deputy Inspector of Survey, Taluk Office, Thuraiyur, Tiruchirappalli District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

19.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Venkatachalam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli. 2.The Tahsildar, Thuraiyur, Tiruchirappalli District. 3.The Deputy Inspector of Survey, Taluk Office, Thuraiyur, Tiruchirappalli District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to survey the petitioner's father land in Trichy District, Thuraiyur Taluk, Kottadhur village Nathan S.F.No.392/1, measuring 3,133.75 sq.ft and fix the boundary of the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Muthukrishnan For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddharthan Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3