- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 December 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 30078/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard both sides.
2.The petitioner challenges the impugned survey notice on the ground set out in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. The petitioner need not have any cause for worry. This is because, the outcome of survey exercise can only be earmarking and showing the four boundaries and nothing else. The survey sketch and survey report will have to be served on the parties concerned. No one can be dispossessed as a result of the survey exercise. In any event, the petitioner is permitted to make his objection and the third respondent shall pass a speaking order on the petitioner's objections.
¶3With this observation and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
18.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To
1.The District Collector, O/o.District Collector, Thoothukudi District.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o.Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District.
3.The Tahsildar, Kayathar, Thoothukudi District.
4.The Firka Surveyor, Land Survey, Kayathar, Thoothukudi District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
18.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.25942 & 25943 of 2023 P.Krishnamoorthy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, O/o.District Collector, Thoothukudi District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o.Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District. 3.The Tahsildar, Kayathar, Thoothukudi District. 4.The Firka Surveyor, Land Survey, Kayathar, Thoothukudi District. 5.P.Seenipandi ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the 4th respondent in proceedings in SFLA 15/2023 dated 04.12.2023 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramsundarvijayraj For Respondent : Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R4 : Mr.V.Ganesh for R5
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.