- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 19 December 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 30168/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the official respondents. Issuance of notice to R4 is dispensed with.
¶2The petitioner has to necessarily move the jurisdictional civil Court for relief. As and when the petitioner files any civil suit, it shall be numbered immediately by the jurisdictional civil Court. The petitioner is also at liberty to file IA. IA shall be disposed of on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible by the learned trial Judge. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter.
¶3With this liberty to the petitioner to move the jurisdictional civil Court, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
19.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi NOTE:Issue Order Copy on 21.12.2023. To
1.The Inspector General Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Mullima Nagar, Mandavelipakkam, Rajaannamalai Puram, Chennai-28.
2.The District Registrar, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.
3.The Sub Registrar, Paramakudi Taluk, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
19.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.Ramkumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Inspector General Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Mullima Nagar, Mandavelipakkam, Rajaannamalai Puram, Chennai-28. 2.The District Registrar, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Sub Registrar, Paramakudi Taluk, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 4.Dharmadurai ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's Protest Application dated 17.10.2023 and for the consequential direction not to register any kind of documents pertaining to the properties covered under Partition Deed in the year 1905 registered as Document No.4233/1905 without obtaining No Objection from the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Suresh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddharthan Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.