VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Ramamoorthy v. The District Collector

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 December 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 30199/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R4 and the learned Government Advocate for R5 & R6.

¶2The petitioner claims to be a cultivating tenant in respect of the petition mentioned land. The civil suit is also pending in this regard. The petitioner's apprehension is that in the guise of conducting survey, he may be dispossessed.

¶3I have been consistently holding that the object of conducting survey is to earmark the four boundaries and nothing else. The boundary stones can be installed. Therefore, the petitioner's apprehension is misplaced. In any event, when a civil suit is pending between the parties, the petitioner has to necessarily move the jurisdictional civil Court for relief.

¶4With this observation and liberty to the petitioner to pursue the civil remedy, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

20.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Collector, District Collectorate, Thanjavur.

2.The District Revenue Officer,

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer,

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

4.The Tahsildar, Budalur Taluk,

5.The Superintendent of Police,

6.The Inspector of Police, Budalur Police Station, Budalur Taluk,

20.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.26032 & 26216 of 2023 Ramamoorthy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, District Collectorate, Thanjavur. 2.The District Revenue Officer, 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, 4.The Tahsildar, Budalur Taluk, 5.The Superintendent of Police, 6.The Inspector of Police, Budalur Police Station, Budalur Taluk, 7.Chandrasekaran 8.R.Rajasekaran 9.V.Paramasivam ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents not to interfere into the petitioner's possession and enjoyment in SF No.106/6 with an extent of 0.18.5 Ares and the Survey Numbers 106/9B with an extent 30.5 ares, agricultural Punja land Pudhupatti Vilage, Budhalur Taluk, Thanjavur District till the final adjudication of the civil suit in O.S.No. 130/2023. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Paranjothi For Respondent : Mr.M.Siddharthan Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R4 : Mr.A.Albert James Government Advocate for R5 & R6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.