VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Murugadhas v. The Commissioner

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
19 December 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 30153/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard both sides.

¶2The petitioner carried out certain civil works for the respondent corporation. The petitioner's bill is yet to be settled.

¶3The respondent is directed to settle the petitioner's bill within a period of four months subject to there being no other impediment. The Writ Petition is allowed accordingly. No costs.

19.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

19.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Murugadhas ... Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner, Nagercoil City Municipal Corporation Office, 166, Balamore Road, Kanyakumari Road, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to pay a sum of Rs.11,05,800/- (Rupees Eleven Lakhs Five Thousand and Eight Hundred only) with interest at the rate of 12 percent per annum from the date of completion of construction works and the interest pending for the already disbursed sum of Rs.47,94,944/- (Rupees Forty Seven Lakhs Ninety Four Thousand Nine Hundred and Forty Four) within a time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mahaboob Fazil for M/s.Lajapathi Roy & Associates For Respondent : Mr.F.Deepak Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.