Tvl Ganga Associates v. State Tax Officer (St) (Fac)

ORDER Heard both sides.

2.The writ petitioner is an assessee coming under the jurisdiction of the respondent. The petitioner failed to file their returns for the month of September 2024. Section 62 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 reads as follows:- "62.Assessment of non-filers of returns.

(1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in section 73 or section 74, where a registered person fails to furnish the return under section 39 or section 45, even after the service of a notice under section 46, the proper officer may proceed to assess the tax liability of the said person to the best of his judgment taking into account all the relevant material which is available or which he has gathered and issue an assessment order within a period of five years from the date specified under section 44 for furnishing of the annual return for the financial year to which the tax not paid relates.

(2) Where the registered person furnishes a valid return within thirty days of the service of the assessment order under sub-section (1), the said assessment order shall be deemed to have been withdrawn but the liability for payment of interest under sub-section (1) of section 50 or for payment of late fee under section 47 shall continue." Invoking the said provision, GSTR 3A notice was issued on 27.07.2023. Thereafter, the impugned order was passed on 17.08.2023. While so, the petitioner herein filed their returns belatedly on 15.10.2023. Though the statute prescribes time limit of 60 days for filing the late returns, Courts have held that this time limit is not mandatory. Once the late return has been filed, the order making best judgement assessment is deemed to have been withdrawn. Applying the statutory mandate set out in Section 62(2) of the Act, it is declared that the impugned order stands automatically withdrawn. It is open to the respondent herein to verify the returns filed by the writ petitioner. If there is any short-payment, fresh show cause notice can be issued making appropriate demand from the assessee.

¶3With the aforesaid liberty to the respondent, this writ petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

13.10.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The State Tax Officer (ST) (FAC), Palakkarai Assessment Circle, Trichy-01.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

2.The Commercial Tax Officer, Palakkarai Assessment Circle, Trichy-01.

13.10.2025

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.10.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.22297 & 22298 of 2025 Tvl.Ganga Associates, Represented by its Proprietor, Mr.Rajagopal, S/o.Subramanian, No.143/40, Second Cross, Ponnagar, Trichy-6200001. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State Tax Officer (ST) (FAC), Palakkarai Assessment Circle, Trichy-01. 2.The Commercial Tax Officer, Palakkarai Assessment Circle, Trichy-01. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the impugned Form GST ASMT 13 along with Form GST DRC-07 in reference no.ZD330823091788T dated 17.08.2023 passed by the 2nd Respondent and quash the same as arbitrary and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice. For Petitioner : Mr.M.N.Bharathi For Respondents : Mr.J.K.Jeyaseelan Government Advocate