Saranya v. The Thasildar

ORDER Heard both sides.

¶2The petitioner wants survey to be conducted.

¶3The learned Government Advocate points out that the petitioner is not having patta in her favour. After the petitioner obtains patta in her favour, she can apply to the first respondent for conducting survey.

¶4With this liberty to the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

19.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The Tahsildar, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

2.The Firka Surveyor, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

19.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Saranya ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 2.The Firka Surveyor, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to survey the lands belongs to the petitioner in S. No.194/4 now sub divided S. No.199/4B and S. No.199/4D, situated at Uchani Village, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukkottai District, based on the petitioner's application dated 06.02.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Rameshkumar For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate