- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 19 December 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 30190/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
¶2The third respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the third respondent to pass order one way or the other. Interested persons shall be put on notice before passing the order.
¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
19.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To
1.The District Collector, Pudukkottai District.
2.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Campus, Pudukkottai District.
3.The Tahsildar, Ponnamaravathy Taluk, Pudukkottai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
19.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN PL.Raman ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Pudukkottai District. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Campus, Pudukkottai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Ponnamaravathy Taluk, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to issue legal heir certificate to the petitioner and other legal heirs in the capacity of Class II legal heirs to the deceased their unmarried paternal uncle Krishna Konar on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 29.03.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sivalingam For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.