- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 19 December 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan, B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 30091/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondent.
¶2It is seen that without issuing Form – II, Form – III has been straightaway issued to the petitioner.
¶3In this view of the matter, the impugned Form – III notice is set aside. The respondent is at liberty to initiate proceedings for evicting the petitioner in accordance with law. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (G.R.S.J.,) & (B.P.J.,)
19.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No RM To The Assistant Engineer Water Resources Department, Irrigation Department, Arimalam, Pudukottai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. and
B.PUGALENDHI, J. RM
19.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.25948 and 25949 of 2023 Rajendran ... Petitioner Vs. The Assistant Engineer Water Resources Department, Irrigation Department, Arimalam, Pudukottai District. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for records pertaining to the FORM III notice dated 11.12.2023 issued by the respondent and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Leninkumar For Respondent : Mr.K.Balasubramani, Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.