Paulraj v. The District Collector

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The second respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the second respondent to pass order one way or the other. Interested persons shall be put on notice before passing the order.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

18.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Tahsildar, Kalligudi Taluk, Madurai District.

3.The Village Administrative Officer, Mayyitanpatti Village, Kallikudi Taluk, Madurai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

18.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.25934 of 2023 Paulraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Tahsildar, Kalligudi Taluk, Madurai District. 3.The Village Administrative Officer, Mayyitanpatti Village, Kallikudi Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents more particularly the 2nd respondent to rectify the extent of the land as 14.58 Ares (equivalent to 36 cents) instead of 9.50 Ares in the Patta bearing No.271 in respect of the petitioners property comprised in Survey No.58/14 situated at Nallamanayakanpatti Village, Kallikudi Taluk, Madurai District based on the sale deed dated 02.09.1968 vide Document No.1699 of 1968 on the file of the Sub Registrar, Kallikudi, Madurai District purchased by the petitioner's father forthwith. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Sankarapandian For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate