Paulraj v. The District Collector

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The second respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the second respondent to pass order one way or the other. Interested persons shall be put on notice before passing the order.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

18.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Tahsildar, Kalligudi Taluk, Madurai District.

3.The Village Administrative Officer, Mayyitanpatti Village, Kallikudi Taluk, Madurai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

18.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.25937 of 2023 Paulraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Tahsildar, Kalligudi Taluk, Madurai District. 3.The Village Administrative Officer, Mayyitanpatti Village, Kallikudi Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents more particularly the 2nd respondent to rectify the name as Paulraj S/o.Subbareddiyar (Petitioners Name) instead of Kumarasamy S/o.Valreddy and Narayanasamy S/o.Subbareddiyar in the Patta bearing No.832 in respect of the property comprised in Survey No. 85/5B1 situated at Siththur Village, Kallikudi Taluk, Madurai District based on the sale deed dated 06.05.1978 vide Document No. 451 of 1978 purchased by the petitioner's father forthwith. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Sankarapandian For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate