Arockia Antony Santhiyagu v. The Collector Officer

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The second respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is for the second respondent to pass order one way or the other. The second respondent shall put the interested persons on notice before passing the final order.

3.The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

19.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To

1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Sub Collector Officer, Office of the Sub Collector, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Tahsildar, Radhapuram Taluk, Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

19.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Arockia Antony Santhiyagu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Sub Collector Officer, Office of the Sub Collector, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Tahsildar, Radhapuram Taluk, Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 25.09.2023 submitted in regard to delete the names that are erroneously entered in the petitioner Patta No. 1204 based on the proceedings of the second respondent passed in Na.Ka.No.(AA3)/09-38/2023 dated 27.09.2023 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.P.Naveenkumar For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader