Bakkiyam v. The District Revenue Officer

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The first respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the first respondent to pass order one way or the other. Interested persons shall be put on notice before passing the order.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

18.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Trichy.

2.The Tahsildar, Srirangam, Trichy.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

18.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Bakkiyam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Trichy. 2.The Tahsildar, Srirangam, Trichy. 3.H.M.Noortheen 4.M.Nazurudeen ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to conduct the enquiry and pass final order on petitioner's petition dated 10.07.2023 relating to rectify the mistake occurred in UDR in respect of Survey No. 92/1C in Sethurapatti Village, Srirangam Taluk, Tiruchirapalli District, and issue patta to the petitioner on the basis of registered sale Deed dated 19.06.1961 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 10.07.2023 within the time stipulated by this High Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.T.Sasidharan Tamilkani For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddharthan Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2