- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 19 December 2023
- Bench
- R.Vijayakumar
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 30269/2023
Judgment
ORDER The present writ petition has been filed by the husband of the deceased employee seeking a direction as against the first respondent herein to consider his appeal dated 27.08.2021 and pass orders.
¶2According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the petitioner's wife who was working in the Transport Department as a Typist was absorbed permanently in Nesamony Transport Corporation with effect from 01.05.1975. She attained superannuation on 30.09.2003 and she passed away on 03.11.2011. During her life time, she was receiving pension from the Transport Corporation alone.
¶3The Government has passed G.O.(Ms) No.96, Transport (RW-1) Department, dated 31.07.2015, wherein, provisions have been made for grant of Government pension to those employees, who were absorbed permanently in the Transport Corporation. Relying upon the said Government Order, the petitioner had approached the third respondent seeking Government Pension. The third respondent, who is the General Manager of the Transport Corporation has rejected the said request. According to the petitioner, the first respondent alone is the authority to decide whether the petitioner is eligible for Government Pension or not. Hence, the petitioner has sent the appeal to the first respondent on 27.08.2021. The petitioner relies upon Rule 49 (13-B) of Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978, to impress upon the Court that, in case, if the petitioner relinquishes his right to receive the family pension from the Transport Corporation, he would be entitled to receive the Government pension.
¶4Considering the above said facts, the first respondent herein is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 27.08.2021 in the light of Rule 49 (13-B) of Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978, and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶5With the above said observations, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
19.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi To
¶1The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.
¶2The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,
(Tirunelveli) Limited, No.19, Trivandrum Road, Vannarpettai, Tirunelveli – 627 003.
¶3The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Tirunelveli) Limited, Nagercoil Region, Nagercoil – 629 001.
¶4The Administrator, Tamil Nadu Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Chennai – 600 002. R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J. ebsi W.P(MD)No.30269 of 2023
19.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR W.P(MD)No.30269 of 2023 P.Lenkeswaran ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009. 2. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Tirunelveli) Limited, No.19, Trivandrum Road, Vannarpettai, Tirunelveli – 627 003. 3. The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Tirunelveli) Limited, Nagercoil Region, Nagercoil – 629 001. 4. The Administrator, Tamil Nadu Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Chennai – 600 002. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent herein to sanction family pension to the petitioner under Rule 49(13-B) of Tamil Nadu Pension Rules by considering the representation of the petitioner, dated 30.01.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Siva Raman For Respondents : Mr.S.Shaji Bino Special Government Pleader – for R1 : Mr.K.Ramaiah Standing Counsel – for R2 and R3 : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh – for R4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.