- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 December 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 30125/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard both sides.
¶2The petitioner's lands were acquired under the Central Act 30 of 2013. The petitioner shall paid certain sum as compensation. The petitioner wants enhancement.
¶3Reference has to be made by the Collector before the appropriate authority under Section 64 of the Act. The petitioner is permitted to submit a proper application before the District Collector, Madurai and it is for the District Collector to take a call on merits and in accordance with law as regards making reference. The District Collector shall pass an order in this regard within a period of 8 weeks from the date of a fresh application from the petitioner herein.
¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
18.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To The Competent Authority-cum-The Special District Revenue Officer, Land Acquisition (Highways), NH 744-A, Madurai Circuit Road, Madurai.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
18.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN V.Gopalakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs. The Competent Authority-cum- The Special District Revenue Officer, Land Acquisition (Highways), NH 744-A, Madurai Circuit Road, Madurai. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.08.2023 within a time stipulated in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Senthil Murugan For Respondent : Mr.S.Ra.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.