- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 19 December 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 30309/2023
Judgment
ORDER
Heard both sides.
2.All that the petitioner wants is registration of the petition mentioned judgment and decree. No exception can be taken to the said request. Limitation set out under Section 23 of the Registration Act, 1908 will not apply. The petitioner is permitted to submit a fresh application for registering the petition mentioned judgment and decree. It shall be received and registered subject to the fulfilment of the usual formalities.
3.This writ petition is allowed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.
19.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To The Sub Registrar, Periyur Sub Registrar Office, Periayur, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA
19.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN K.S.Kandasamy Konar ... Petitioner Vs. The Sub Registrar, Periyur Sub Registrar Office, Periayur, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to register the petitioner's document of judgment and Decree dated 17.07.2018 in S.A(MD)No.875 of 2006 on the file of this Court within a stipulated period as framed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sathya Singh For Respondent : Mr.S.RA.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.