VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Janarthanan. P (Edp No.6560) v. The Management

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 December 2023
Bench
R.Vijayakumarauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 30994/2023

Judgment

ORDER The present writ petition has been filed by a Selection Grade Senior Tradesman of the respondent Corporation who attained superannuation on 31.05.2022.

¶2According to the writ petitioner, his terminal benefits were released only on 02.06.2023. Hence, he has made a representation on

10.12.2023 for payment of interest for the belated disbursal of the terminal benefits. Since there is no response, this writ petition has been filed.

¶3In view of the above said facts, the respondent herein is directed to pay interest at the rate of 6% from the due date till 01.06.2023 within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶4With the above said observations, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

22.12.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : gbg To The General Manager, The Management ofTamil Nadu State Express Transport Corporation Ltd., Pallavan Salai, Chennai-2. R. VIJAYAKUMAR

,J.

gbg Dated:

22.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.12.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR P.Janarthanan ... Petitioner Vs. The Management ofTamil Nadu State Express Transport Corporation Ltd., Represented by its General Manager, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-2. ... Respondent PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 12% per annum, for the period of delay from the petitioner's date of retirement (31.05.2022) to till the date of reimbursement (02.06.2023) of amount paid towards the petitioner's terminal and pension benefits, namely EPF employee's contribution, Gratuity and Encashment of Earned/Sick Leave and other monetary benefits etc., within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court, without affecting the petitioner's right to claim balance amounts towards those benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vashik Ali For Respondent : Mr.K.Senthil Kumar Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.