VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Murugan .T v. The Director

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 December 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 30919/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The third respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the third respondent to pass order one way or the other. Interested persons shall be put on notice before passing the order.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

22.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The Director, Directorate of Municipal Administration, No.75, Urban Administrative Building, Santhome High Road, MRC Nagar, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai-600028.

2.The District Collector, Kanniyakumari District, at Nagercoil.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

22.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN T.Murugan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director, Directorate of Municipal Administration, No.75, Urban Administrative Building, Santhome High Road, MRC Nagar, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai-600028. 2.The District Collector, Kanniyakumari District, at Nagercoil. 3.The Commissioner, Nagercoil City Municipal Corporation Office, No.145, 146, 147, Balamoe Road, Nagercoil-629001, Kanniyakumari District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 3rd respondent to pass appropriate orders on the representation dated 17.04.2023 made by the petitioner herein to disburse the deposited amount along with interest in respect of shops no.1,2,3,7 and 10 at Anna Bus Stand, Nagercoil, Kanniyakumari District, within a stipulated time period as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Aravinthan For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate for R1 & R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.