Sakthivel v. The Tahsildar

ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side.

¶2The petitioner's online application has been negatived on the ground that there is a discrepancy in the name of the petitioner's father. In the computer chitta, it has been mentioned as Muthupudayar and in the death and legal heir certificate, it has been mentioned as Pitchai. Citing this discrepancy, the petitioner request was negatived.

¶3It is open to the petitioner to file a fresh online application after addressing this discrepancy. As and when such an online application is filed, the same will be considered on merits and in accordance with law, by the respondents.

¶4The Writ Petition is disposed of, accordingly. No costs.

21.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No RM To:

1.The Tahsildar Kulathur Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

2.The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. RM

21.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Sakthivel ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar Kulathur Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 2.The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider the petitioner's online application 2023/0103/22/270388 dated on 27.10.2023 for joint patta name transfer in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vivek For Respondents: Mr.S.Ra.Ramachandran, Additional Government Pleader