- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 December 2023
- Bench
- S.M. Subramaniam, V. Lakshminarayanan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 30791/2023
Judgment
ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The proceedings in Na.Ka.A5/2091/2023, dated 15.12.2023, issued by the Tahsildar is susceptible to an appeal under Section 10 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905.
¶2Therefore, granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. The petitioner is at liberty to raise all the grounds raised in the present Writ Petition. No costs. Consequently, connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. (S.M.S., J.) & (V.L.N., J.)
21.12.2023
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No SJ To The Tahsildar, Kadavur Taluk, Karur District – 621 313.
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. SJ
21.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.26398 and 26399 of 2023 Manokar ... Petitioner Vs. The Tahsildar, Kadavur Taluk, Karur District – 621 313. ...Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in Na.Ka.A5/2091/2023 dated 15.12.2023 on the file of the Respondent and quash the same and consequently directing the Respondents to proceed as per the Order of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.(MD) No.22354 of 2023 dated 14.09.2023. For Petitioners : Mr.Romeo Roy Alfred For Respondent : Mr.M.Lingadurai Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.