Kalaiyarasi v. The District Collector

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The first respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is for the first respondent to pass order one way or the other. The first respondent shall put the interested persons on notice before passing the final order.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

21.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To

1.The District Collector, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.

3.The Tahsildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

21.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Kalaiyarasi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai. 3.The Tahsildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 and 3 to complete the proceedings issued by the first respondent O.Mu.E-117/4853/2023/E2, dated 07.08.2023 based on the petitioner's representation dated 26.07.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Rameshkumar For Respondents : Mr.S.RA.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader