VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Ramanathan .M v. The Regional Passport Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 December 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 30663/2023

Judgment

ORDER

Heard both sides.

2.The petitioner seeks issuance of passport. He has submitted an application before the jurisdictional passport officer. Apprehending that it may not be processed in view of his involvement in a criminal case, the present writ petition came to be filed.

3.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the criminal case registered against the petitioner is pending at the FIR stage.

4.It is well settled that when the case is pending only at the FIR stage, there is no impediment for the Regional Passport Officer to grant relief.

5.The petitioner has to appear before the jurisdictional police and file an affidavit indicating his contact details. The petitioner apart from furnishing his residential address must also give his WhatsApp mobile number, e-mail ID. This is because, if any adverse final report is filed and the same is also taken on file by the jurisdictional criminal court, it should be possible to serve summons on the petitioner with the available details. The petitioner shall give an undertaking that the prosecution initiated against him will not be stalled on account of his absence from India. He should undertake that summons can be served on him through E-mail/WhatsApp. If necessary, the petitioner will have to execute a special vakalat in future so that he can be represented by his counsel in the proceedings in terms of Section 205 of Cr.P.C.

6.Upon the passport authority being satisfied that such an undertaking affidavit has been filed before the jurisdictional police, the jurisdictional Regional Passport Officer shall process the petition-mentioned application and issue passport subject to fulfilment of the other usual formalities.

7.This writ petition is allowed on these terms. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

21.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To

1.The Regional Passport Officer, O/o. The Regional Passport Officer, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai – 625 002.

2.The Inspector of Police, Elayangudi Police Station, Sivagangai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and W.M.P(MD)No.26356 of 2023

21.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)No.26356 of 2023 M.Ramanathan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Regional Passport Officer, O/o. The Regional Passport Officer, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai – 625 002. 2.The Inspector of Police, Elayangudi Police Station, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned communication issued by the first respondent vide Letter Ref. No.SCN/316339737/23 dated 29.11.2023 and quash the same and consequently directing the first respondent to issue passport to the petitioner in pursuance of online application made vide File No. MD1065947998923 dated 07.11.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Shanmugaraja Sethupathi For Respondents : Mr.K.Ashok Kumar Ram for R.1 Mr.A.Albert James Government Advocate for R.2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.