Chandrakala .S v. The District Collector

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The third respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the third respondent to pass order one way or the other.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

22.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Samayanallur, Madurai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

22.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.Chandrakala ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Samayanallur, Madurai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to pass appropriate orders on the representation dated 05.12.2023 made by petitioner to take action under the provisions of The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in Accordance with law within a period that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jerin Mathew For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate