Naranammal v. The District Registrar

ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for R1 & R2.

¶2The petitioner appears to have lost the parent document. The sale deed to be presented by the petitioner shall be registered subject to the formalities set out in the second proviso to Rule 55A of the Registration Rules.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

22.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Registrar, District Registrar Office (Registration), Thoothukudi District.

2.The Sub Registrar Officer, Kovilpatti Sub Registration Office, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

22.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Naranammal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Registrar, District Registrar Office (Registration), Thoothukudi District. 2.The Sub Registrar Officer, Kovilpatti Sub Registration Office, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District. 3.P.Mahendran ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents No.2 to register the sale document presented by the petitioner for registration without insisting the original registered Document No.7629/2008 dated 21.11.2008 based on the petitioner's representation dated 17.11.2023 within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ponraj For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate for R1 & R2